
Showing posts with label Cause. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cause. Show all posts
Monday, 28 November 2022
'Lead' As Circumstantial Identifying Process

Labels:
Cause,
Identifying,
John Mortimer,
Transitivity
Friday, 11 December 2020
Tagged Imperative Or Metaphorical Interrogative?
The first analysis treats this instance as a tagged imperative clause, whereas the second treats it as an interpersonal metaphor of mood: a command realised as polar interrogative clause. Cf
This raises the question as to whether the tagging of the imperative facilitated the genesis of the metaphorical variant.
Labels:
Behavioural,
Cause,
Grammatical Metaphor,
Imperative,
Interrogative,
Mood,
Mood Tag,
Theme,
Transitivity
Saturday, 24 October 2020
Matter Qualifier vs Cause Qualifier
Tuesday, 24 March 2020
Gene Competition
genes
|
compete
|
for selection
|
Behaver
|
Process: behavioural
|
Cause: purpose
|
Such a construal ascribes both consciousness (Behaver) and intention (Purpose) to functional segments of DNA molecules.
Labels:
Behavioural,
Cause,
Grammatical Metaphor,
Transitivity
Monday, 10 February 2020
Decoding 'Dmytro Poremskyi' As Robin Fawcett
Decoding 'Dmytro Poremskyi' by reference to Robin Fawcett:
Encoding Robin Fawcett By Reference To Dmytro Poremskyi
Robin Fawcett
|
has been pretending to be
|
Dmytro Poremskyi
|
on the NASFLA Facebook site
|
for purposes of deception
|
Value
|
Process: identifying
|
Token
|
Location
|
Cause: purpose
|
has been pretending
|
to be
|
ɑ
|
' β
|
Using the pseudonym 'Dmytro Poremskyi', Robin Fawcett wrote:
I respect Robin Fawcett's thought and his style of coherently arguing his point.
Sunday, 12 August 2018
Attribute As Theme Of Elaborating Hypotactic Clause Nexus
Homosexual and jailbird
|
was
|
he
|
nevertheless
|
as bad as he was painted
|
Theme
|
Rheme
| |||
Attribute
|
Process: attributive
|
Carrier
|
circumstantial Attribute
|
Halliday & Matthiessen (2014: 469-70):
With non-finite elaborating hypotactic nexuses, there is a special construction where the dependent precedes the dominant; … These elaborating clauses are always ‘intensive attributive relational’ ones where the Process is implicit and the Attribute is typically the only explicit element of the clause. … the nearest agnates are non-finite and finite non-defining relative clauses … and this explains among other things why clausal elements may be present together with the Attribute (thus showing that the nominal group is an element in a separate clause rather than an element in the clause that follows) .... The effect of the construction is to give thematic status within the elaborating clause nexus to the Attribute of the elaboration.
Unbriefed on the subject of the glabrous
playwright and novelist
|
the president
|
looked
|
wildly
|
about
|
for his minister of culture
|
= β
|
α
|
||||
Theme
|
Rheme
|
||||
Attribute
|
Behaver
|
Process: behavioural
|
Manner
|
Location: orientation
|
Cause: purpose
|
Labels:
Alan Bennett,
Attributive,
Behavioural,
Cause,
Elaboration,
Hypotaxis,
Location,
Manner,
Theme,
Transitivity
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)