A plausible assumption is that the principles of language are fixed and innate. (Chomsky 2000: 122; New Horizons)
A plausible
assumption
|
is
|
the
principles of language are fixed and innate
|
||||||
Value/Identified
|
Process
|
Token/Identifer
|
||||||
|
A plausible assumption
|
is
|
the principles of language
|
are
|
fixed and innate
|
Theme
|
Rheme
|
|||
Given
|
New
|
Of course, this is not a plausible assumption, because Chomsky also assumes that the principles of language are components of a "genetically-determined" language faculty, and as the evolution of biological species demonstrates, genes and their expressions are not "fixed". If they are "innate", they are not "fixed". Platonic essentialism/idealism is not empirical science.
"Platonic essentialism/idealism is not empirical science."
ReplyDeleteDavid Hume just entered the chat...