Tuesday, 22 March 2016

Projected Vs Elaborating Qualifier

the
theory

of (‘about’) evolution
Deictic
Thing
Qualifier

the
theory

of (‘called’) Natural Selection
Deictic
Thing
=
Qualifier



decoding ‘the theory’ operatively:
the theory
covers
evolution
Token/Identified
Process: relational: circumstantial: matter
Value/Identifier


encoding ‘the theory’ receptively:
the theory
is called
Natural Selection
Value/Identified
Process: relational: intensive
Token/Identifier

Monday, 21 March 2016

Beneficiaries In Existential Clauses

Halliday and Matthiessen (2014: 345):
The Beneficiary is the one to whom or for whom the process is said to take place. It appears in ‘material’ and ‘verbal’ clauses, and occasionally in ‘relational’ ones. (In other words, there are no Beneficiaries in ‘mental’, ‘behavioural’ or ‘existential’ clauses.)

there
is
a present
(just) for you
under the christmas tree


Process:
existential
Medium
Existent
Beneficiary

Location

Sunday, 20 March 2016

'Smoke' Serving As Material (Not Behavioural) Process


A little fat man of Bombay
was smoking
his pipe
one very hot day
Agent
Actor
Process:
material
Medium
Goal
Location


Blogger Comment:

In Halliday & Matthiessen (2014: 649), this type of clause is erroneously analysed as behavioural, even though pipe is not a (physiological or psychological) Behaviour, and Medium not Range:
… the words pipe and smoke are typically related as Range to Process in a behavioural process clause.

Saturday, 19 March 2016

'Prove' Serving As Attributive (Not Identifying) Process


this
proves (‘makes true’)
my point
Attributor
Process: attributive
Attribute
Carrier



Blogger Comment:

In Deploying Functional Grammar (Martin et al. 2010: 123), this is erroneously (and bizarrely) analysed as follows:


this
proves
(that)
my point
Assigner
Process: identifying
Token
Value