Wednesday, 24 February 2016

Why Mathematical Equations Are Part Of Language

E
=
mc2
Token/Identified
Process: intensive
Value/Identifier

Energy
equals
mass multiplied by the speed of light squared
Token/Identified
Process: intensive
Value/Identifier

mass
multiplied by the speed of light squared
Thing
Qualifier

multiplied
by the speed of light squared
Process: material: abstract
Extent: frequency

by
the speed of light squared
minor Process
Range

the speed of light
squared
Thing
Qualifier

the
speed
of light
Deictic
Thing
Qualifier

squared
multiplied
by itself
Process: material: abstract
Extent: frequency

by
itself
minor Process
Range

In spoken mode, the content of mathematics is realised by the phonological system of language. It is only in written mode that the experiential content is realised by a field-specific graphological system.

By the same token, unlike non-linguistic semiotic systems, mathematical equations can be read aloud (e.g. in English, Arabic, Hindi, Mandarin etc.).

It is not the expression plane that determines whether a semiotic system is linguistic or not, but whether or not its content plane is stratified into meaning (semantics) and wording (lexicogrammar). That is, whereas linguistic systems are tri-stratal, non-linguistic semiotic systems are bi-stratal — just content and expression.  Non-linguistic systems therefore do not afford grammatical metaphor. Mathematical equations, on the other hand, make extensive use of ideational metaphor, with sequences of figures being realised as a single participant in an identifying clause, as shown above.

Tuesday, 16 February 2016

Decoding 'A Loving God'

a loving god
is not
the existential cause of a world in which organisms that feel pain eat each other
Token/Identified
Process: relational
Value/Identifier


a loving god
is
an adaptive semiotic response by some of those organisms
Token/Identified
Process: relational
Value/Identifier

Wednesday, 10 February 2016

'Theory' And 'Explanatory Framework' In A Relation Of Identity


A theory
provides
an explanatory framework
for some observation
Token/Identified
Process: relational: possessive: benefaction
Value/Identifier
Matter?

The relation identifies 'a theory' as 'an explanatory framework'.
The identity decodes 'a theory' by reference to 'an explanatory framework'.

Tuesday, 9 February 2016

Test Your Process Type Knowledge


She
projected
her arrow
into his heart
Actor
Process: material
Goal
Location: spatial: motion: towards

He
projected
the slide
onto the screen
Actor
Process: material
Goal
Location: spatial: motion: towards

He
projects
his motives
onto others
Actor
Process: material
Goal
Location: spatial: motion: towards

Actors
project
their voices
Actor
Process: material
Goal

The beam
projects
beyond the eaves
Carrier
Process: relational
circumstantial Attribute

His posture
projects
defeat
Token
Process: relational
Value

This report
projects
next year’s expenses
Sayer
Process: verbal
Verbiage

Sayers
project
wordings

Sayer/Medium
Process: verbal
Verbiage/Range
from above (meaning)
Actor/Agent
Process: material
Goal/Medium
from roundabout (wording)

Sensers
project
meanings

Senser/Medium
Process: mental
Phenomenon/Range
from above (meaning)
Actor/Agent
Process: material
Goal/Medium
from roundabout (wording)

From Above:
Is the Process 'projects' other-engendered (effective) or self-engendered (middle)? i.e.
Are 'Sayers' and 'Sensers' the Agent (participant as cause) of the Process 'projects'?
Or are 'Sayers' and 'Sensers' the Medium through which the Process 'projects' unfolds?

From Roundabout:
What is the unmarked present tense: present-in-present (material) or simple present (other)?