a theory
|
provides
|
an explanatory framework [for some observation]
|
Token
|
Process: identifying: possession: benefaction
|
Value
|
Thursday, 17 August 2017
The Identity Of Theory And Explanatory Framework
Friday, 28 July 2017
Counterexpectancy: Exceeding Vs Limiting
Well he was an ugly guy
With an ugly face
An also-ran
in the human race
And even God got sad
just looking at him
— Laurie Anderson Gravity's Angel
Well
|
he
|
was
|
an ugly guy
|
with an ugly face
|
an also-ran
|
in the human race
|
|||
Subject
|
Finite
|
Complement
|
Adjunct
|
|
Mood
|
Residue
| |||
And
|
even
|
God
|
got
|
sad
|
|
Mood Adjunct: intensity: counterexpectancy: exceeding
|
Subject
|
Finite
|
Predicator
|
Complement
|
|
Mood
|
Residue
|
||||
just
|
looking
|
at him
|
Mood Adjunct: intensity: counterexpectancy: limiting
|
Predicator
|
Adjunct
|
Mood
|
Residue
| |
In terms of appraisal theory,
the author's attitude to him is one of negative appreciation (ugly, ugly, also-ran),
and the author's projection of God's attitude to the look of him is negative affect (sad).
Monday, 24 July 2017
A Stylistic Use Of Verbal Assignment
'We were practising for the panto Captain Ransom puts on at Christmas.' Danny now seemed more confident.
'I can confirm that.' Sandy confirmed it.
I
|
can confirm
|
that
|
Sandy
|
confirmed
|
it
|
||
Attributor
|
Process
|
Attribute
|
Carrier
|
Attributor
|
Process
|
Attribute
|
Carrier
|
Here confirm is interpreted as 'say (as) true' — the verbal assignment of an attributive relation. It could also be interpreted as a verbal Process, though this would be less informative.
In using confirm, the author has identified the more delicate category of statement (speech function) realised by each of the clauses.
Instead of construing a projection nexus such as 'I can confirm that' said Sandy, the author has presented a quote juxtaposed with an agnate report. In doing so, the relation between the two is effected cohesively rather than structurally: by anaphoric reference (that < it) and lexical cohesion (repetition of confirm).
This might also be seen as an ingenious way of getting around the absence of projection as a cohesive conjunctive relation.
Labels:
Assignment,
Attributive,
Grammatical Metaphor,
John Mortimer,
Projection,
Qualitative Process
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)